What an interesting day. Most of you know I am into transparency, and feel there is a general lack of accountability by these same companies that are scorching the earth with a new transparency, and openness.  It is always curious to me that these companies that are changing the world to be less secretive and opaque are *precisely* just that.  But in my hawkwatching the ethical grey areas between social media as a communication tool, vs social media as a profitable business – I might have even crossed the line and suggested a wonderful hotel company, JDV, was part of this when they weren’t. Apologies to anyone that got caught up in that, and HATS OFF to Christa at JDV – a patient, professional, intelligent, and CLASSY woman, who took her time patiently educating me rather than giving me the “what fer” I likely deserved.  But it was collateral damage from friendly fighter in a great battle.

We, as technologists, hoteliers, and business people have a higher standard to live up to when it comes to ethics.  There are plenty of people that black hat or dip into the grey areas, but we don’t have that luxury as intellectual leaders and mentors to people learning the business.  We have to firmly entrench ourselves in crystal clear waters of ethical, transparent, accountable behavior.  Tripadvisor is getting into some of these grey areas in light of combatting those unethical people writing fake reviews.  They have been so beaten up in the press, it’s obvious they need to rigirously standardize and verify reviews.

Review Direct is their imperfect answer to that, and I think they should reconsider it.  When I have the option, our hotels would be absolutely nuts not to use it, whether it is a good or bad review that is published.  Some properties may not want to use it, as their product or services, condition, etc isn’t at that level yet.  But there are some serious ethical issues and liability concerns I have about the product.  So…

 

Dear Tripadvisor and Market Metrix (or the two people who read this blog, pass it along please):

 

Basically, here’s my concern:

 

Review Direct is basically Tripadvisor sanctioning “paying for more reviews”.  There’s *SO* many questions here: about marginalizing the equity of Market Metrix’s internal reviews, about unfair advantages within competitive markets that basically lead to gaming the popularity index, etc.

 

I know Tripadvisor needs to legitimize reviews, but this is the wrong way to go about it.  Beyond my concerns about any pilot hotels that were secretly allowed to pilot inside of markets, it seems an unfair advantage for hotels with marketing dollars vs the mom and pop that doesn’t have the money to pay for it.

 

Basically, a mom and pop hotel cannot post paper comment card guest reviews as a Tripadvisor review, but market metrix will automate that internal discussion onto a public forum, *FOR A FEE*.

 

Not only does that point to competitive disadvantage, but there’s some serious legal liabilities as well.  It’s been well documented that higher Tripadvisor popularity rating equates to higher revenue, so couldn’t someone sue, saying that it is an uneven playing field, anti-competitive, etc? There could be monetary damages.  For our properties that remain at #1, we know it is worth $100K’s in revenue.  You may have bitten your own rear with all the obvious data collected that points to ranking and revenue.  If what determines popularity index is amount of reviews, how recent, and rating, aren’t you just gaming your own algorithm by finding a back door that increases number of reviews, *for a fee*?

 

It feels like a legal liability to a number of the parties involved.  I just don’t like it because I like a free market…. this should be rolled out to everyone, equally, immediately, at no price.  All hotel owners should be able to post verified comments and reviews… not just a few at a price.  I hate to think that social media or hospitality could fall victim to the unethical business practices on Wall Street or Capital Steps – it’s not how hard you work, how ethically you manage – it’s who you know and who you bribe.

 

But from a protectionist aspect, I would imagine there are some legal liabilities here that should be addressed before you have some ambulance chaser with dollar signs in their eyes.  There are some CRAZY unethical and penny pinching people in every business, and I would hate to see anyone sidelined by our “Sue Everybody” culture.  That’s not me…. you won’t find me near a lawyer. lol  Oh wait, all my friends. =)  But if Tripadvisor’s popularity index can be equated to revenue, then paying to increase your popularity seems very, *VERY* much a grey area.

 

Just my thoughts. I hate rabble rousing, but it’s something to consider for the benefit of both of your companies.  I know it’s a fast moving moment in human history, and missteps are brutal.  But I really don’t think you have considered this part of it.

 

Thanks for listening.

Discussion:  What if a hotel, or hotels, started doing this. advertising it, earnestly.  Putting a splash page, or a bit of information, or a blog post that says, “Hey… guys… book with us”.


What would the result or ramification be?


——————————————————
Hey. Guys. Howdy. I thought I would put it simply, so people who don’t yet know, would know.

 

Please never, ever, ever, ever, ever book on sites like Expedia, Hotwire, Travelocity, Priceline.com.

 

After your research, book *direct* (call, online booking engine, whatever) with the hotel you choose.

 

If you book direct, your rate will *ALWAYS* be the lowest rate (99% of the time, at least all the hotels you *want* to stay at, and aren’t horribly managed, just phoning it in).

 

Not only that, you will get better service.  When you buy from an online travel agent (like above), your contract is with them, and the hotel’s contract is with them – so the entire concept of hospitality is interrupted, and a hotel has absolutely no capacity to resolve issues. Some hotels may even end up using Expedia guests like pawns as they make room for their Kings and Queens. Not at ours, but it happens.

 

OTA’s were a stopgap solution when the non-tech hotel industry was being left behind during the early days of online distribution.  Now, distribution has changed, and continues to change in rapid and meaningful ways.  OTA’s aren’t as necessary anymore.

 

Also – Hotels are smarter, and now have ways of better serving guest needs, and reaching you in the most of convenient, and transparent of ways.  Part of that involves the guest, and their awareness to book direct with the hotel, on the website booking engine, or make a old fashioned phone call.Whatever you do, if you make sure your reservation is a contract directly with the hotel, and not a 3rd party, every single one of your travel experiences will be better.

 

Thanks for listening.

 

http://www.danpink.com/2013/04/why-givers-often-succeed-5-questions-for-adam-grant

Great article on why “Givers in business succeed”

I really dig the giving concept – it is my way of life, and I am never taken advantage of…. even when they think they are, they’re not, because I don’t let them. That’s how giving I try to be. =) I also try to make sure that anyone I am sitting in front of feels like the most important person in the world. People have the right to feel that once while they make the job search or product pitch rounds….

But as a skeptic into debunking psuedoscience, it always bothers me when the people using mystical words don’t even understand their history or premise. These concepts are fake, but for your edification:

Karma would impact the next life.

Darma impacts *this life*.

People interchange these hokum concepts because they are meaningless…. but it’s important to know that “What goes around comes around”, or “Live by the sword, die by the sword”, is about Darma, not Karma.

————-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-altucher/10-reasons-to-quit-your-job_b_3020829.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

“And that’s the new paradigm. The middle class has died. The American Dream never really existed. It was a marketing scam.”

 

LOVE that quote…. great read with some powerfully awkward and uncomfortable truths.
I always tell people- screw college unless you want the social experience. Save your money, learn a trade, or a craft – apprentice for real work skill, grind it out via mentorship (difficult to find nowadays, to be sure).  By all means, pick your profession by finding a job that can’t be moved or downsized…. find a skill that cannot be disrupted or shifted.  Cabinet making, hospitality, whatever…. the dream is dead, and if we keep getting young people who don’t want to work but just want to startup… we’re doomed.  The people that choose real work at a younger age will be heads and shoulders above the vast majority.

 

A man wrote a letter to a small hotel in a Midwest town he planned to visit on his vacation.

He wrote, “I would very much like to bring my dog with me. He is well-groomed and very well behaved.  Would you be willing to permit me to keep him in my room with me at night?”

 

An immediate reply came from the hotel owner, who wrote:

 

“SIR, I’ve been operating this hotel for many years. In all that time, I’ve never had a dog steal towels, sheets, silverware or pictures off the walls.  I’ve never had to evict a dog in the middle of the night for being drunk and disorderly.  And I’ve never had a dog run out on a hotel bill.  Yes, indeed, your dog is welcome at my hotel.  And, if your dog will vouch for you, you’re welcome to stay here, too.”

This Quora question here finally provided me an outlet to sum up all my tired cliches. The best in this business are constantly innovating, but here’s why the overall industry is a conservative bunch of bores. This may clue all you tech and app people in to why we are so hard to reach, and even if you do find access to the innovator or connected “in the know” guy at any hospitality company, the difference between “getting it” and implementation is day and night… especially from a corporate HQ to property level.  Getting acceptance at corporate is easy.  Getting the idea distributed and implemented is a different story.

So, why don’t hotels innovate more?

Historically, we’re not a money business, and we’re certainly not a tech business. The famous saying is “Hotels aren’t pioneers, because pioneers were shot in the back with arrows.” We couldn’t afford to make capital cost mistakes with new fangled design, tech, etc. If you have ever let an architect make a daring and new “tech” design decision, and then during your opening week have to rip an entire HVAC system from a brand new hotel because it doesn’t work, you learn VERY QUICKLY not to take risks on innovating something if there is a potential failure rate. Within the last couple years, radiant flooring had been this issue – architects and owners designing from residential preference versus the complexity of commercial application. It’s a problem, and it makes hotelier like me seem boring. But the simple fact is this:

Do you want to innovate and potentially fail spectacularly, or do you want to be boring and conservative and have an operating hotel?

It’s not always *our* money to take those risks with, either… and a good ownership or management group will protect the assets. When we tried to pioneer infrastructural solutions ranging from phones or internet, we got burned by trusting salesman whose interest is to sell, and not worried about back end support. So we lost a lot of money trying to pioneer systems like that. Sales people will always sell products that their operational department can’t support – like marketing writing checks that ops can’t cash.

What we quickly learned is that we can have a hospital or dormitory spend their own capital (and public vs private) funds, learning from their errors…

Then we steal the way they built out infrastructure at infinitely lower costs because you don’t have the learning curve or associated costs with capital spending failures.

This is true of phones, which I talk about here:
The Story of the In-Room Phone, & the future of on property telephony

and even reaches something seemingly prosaic and simple, like in room coffee, which I talk about here: A coffee laden ramble about… hotel coffee. What does your coffee program, or lack of it, say about your hotel brand?

You will note the similar “pioneer” themes – and that we become conservative in the face of multi-layered complexities in regards to execution.

Basically, hotels aren’t a money business. They are about hospitality, and part of being hospitable means having things that work properly. Early adopters suffer everything from outages to glitches, and more – and it isn’t in the best interest of a hotel to spend liberal amounts of capital on things with high rates of failure. This is why you can easily see a trend of about 10 years behind the times for everything…. not just phones or wireless infrastructure, but even with websites and SEO, as well.

The sea change moment for hospitality might have been SEO – many hotels got so burned by their own unawareness that they vowed never to be left in the dust again. I still know some hotels that can’t be found in their market. That’s why the savvier of hospitality groups are *VERY* on top of social media, and most operators look at it as a phone, instead of the billboard. Marketing is trying to lead us astray, but in the end it will become an operator’s real time brand management and guest expectation / service tool.

Anyways, that basically sums it up:

Hotels aren’t innovators simply because we aren’t innovative. We rather be boring and actually work, than innovative and broken.

Why don’t we innovate? Because that, historically, hasn’t been our job, and we can’t afford to.

Next Page »