Entries tagged with “customer relations”.
Did you find what you wanted?
Wed 25 Feb 2009
There is sudden, endless interest on how to instill the labour for a social media person on the property level of a hotel. But if you look back in my posts, you will be reminded that hotels are not technological innovators, and are typically behind the curve. Nothing to be ashamed of, as we aren’t in the technology business. We are the hotel business. Sometimes, however, it feels like we have been co-opted (Some of us still remember punch card days).
Until we end up back in the “guest ledger on a lazy Susan” days, much of this “social” or “new” media is being thrust toward the marketing and PR firms of hotels, and they are panicked looking for measurable impressions, calculable effect, and readying themselves to be in control of a massive and daunting visual display of graphs, charts, and quantified data.
But data is not readily available, and measurements are confounding at best (Just because we have become comfortable with a tool of measuring impact of dollars spent, doesn’t mean it’s flawless. For this reason, I still suspect print measurement).
In the end I think “ROI” conversations will fall by the wayside as properties recognize that you simply need to be part of the conversation. It will be like a “internet concierge”, and just part of your overall labour budget.
Back to the PR people.
It is damning for marketing groups however, because in a world of too much information these poor people just became responsible for so much more – keywords, tags, blogs, videos, user generated content, etc. Frankly, keeping up with my google alerts is a job within itself. So I have a empathic concern for marketing groups that will have to hire some Gen Y kid just to watch the stream of internet consciousness…. It is confusing, and overwhelming. Learning to not waste your time with some, while being hyper-aware of other data… this is the ultimate experience of separating the wheat and chaff, as well as looking for a needle in a haystack the entire time.
New Media and old Marketing have about as much in common as <insert witty dichotomy>, but these companies are still tagged with the responsibility of following this new stream of information. It is like when a F&B manager is fired, the floor manager fills in the F&B Manager spot… and then what do you have? You have a floor manager (someone skilled at a specific job) acting as an F&B manager (a totally different job)… you haven’t increased the floor managers salary (limiting incentive to fill the role), but that person becomes taxed/stressed and is doing a job outside their experience level or role. Such is the path of social media being slopped on top of traditional marketing firms responsibilities.
Until hoteliers, operators, marketing teams, and ownership step back, recognize what social media is, and implement someone who is meant to grow into the role and focus on the online concierge aspects of web 2.0…. owners will be anxious, marketing groups will be taxed and confused, and hotel management will be nervous.
Social media is not Marketing & PR the same way college degrees or public relations have prepared people for. Giving the job to someone that doesn’t understand it in the hopes of being successful with a campaign, while performing on the job training, is dangerous and we need to move past it.
At least, let’s let them focus on their skill set, while allowing already operating members of the social media conversation to fill in as “online concierge”. Traditional marketing and PR is changing, but it will never go away. It will be in flux for some time, and might put a new notch in the belt buckle, but it will always be necessary and vital. It won’t be, however, the long term mitigator of social media. This is a slapdash approach to new media, and in time it will move to a property level, corporate/property specific job.
What’s more is that this is an exciting moment in hospitality. This is new job forming! How often does that happen? We have been skilled at getting rid of the labour pool for years (just think of the last time you saw an elevator operator or shoe shine booth). This new position will be a customer relations specialist , and will be filled by erudite, excited, savvy people that have hospitality’s core beliefs at their forefront: Be aware of the guests needs, and service them based on those needs. Whether they are in front of you or not is irrelevant. It isn’t about controlling your brand, damage control, or PR. It is about earnest concern about a guest’s reactions, needs, or thoughts. It is about being real in your conversation with a guest, precisely what much of marketing is not. To be fair, at least we can lighten the load on these confused firms that overreact to one bad review, or panic because they still don’t “get” twitter.
I look at this as a great opportunity for hotels to transcend the limiting mentality that web 2.0 is all marketing and PR. It is daunting to be sure, but it is also humbling, fulfilling, and vital to the ethos of your brand, and the core of your offerings.
It’s time to get hip, and it’s time to be real.
Tags: CGR, CRM, customer generated review, customer relations, hotel marketing, internet concierge, marketing, new media, online marketing, PR, smo, Social Media, UGR, user generated review, web 2.0
Sun 22 Feb 2009
Posted by Michael Hraba under Hospitality Marketing
231 views | No Comments
I have already experienced with a few hotels a blase attitude towards peer reviews because it is “simply a place for people to bitch”, or “whiner central”. Many hotels have a wait and see attitude about social media, and many are as cantankerous and defensive as…. well… the industry has typically been when regarding technological or social advancement. We were one of the last industry’s to go wireless, and we were also one of the last to enforce a “no beard” policy.
An aside about the hotel industry if I may:
Industry wide, we are not adapters… nor are we pioneers. One of the most respected men I know in the industry told me an old industry joke: “Pioneers were shot in the back.”
ROI is hard to justify when it comes to pioneering new technology that is buggy and will probably fail. Anyone ever had to rip out faulty construction three days before opening will attest trying the “newer” tech isn’t always the “safest” tech. And don’t get talking to me about radiant flooring used in commercial hotel projects. Ugh.
So, it has been hotels standard operating procedure to do the following:
Wait for some other “idiot” (said endearingly) to pioneer the tech. Let *that* person waste all their money trying it, figuring it out, and then fixing it when it breaks.
After 6 months, you take what they did, *AND WHAT THEY LEARNED*, and do it right, better, and cheaper.
This is a fail safe business plan to be sure, but it does backfire.
So back to the current state of things, IE Hotels Backfiring. If you are a hotel and don’t get social media peruse the below.
Hotels seem to have a somewhat guarded and defensive approach to social media. Even the wise properties that are innovative, internet aware, and with strong marketing teams… they are at times LOST. Scared that their old marketing trends are dying, and now their rolodex and contacts and college degree are quickly becoming a vestige, or worse… irrelevant (that is marketing degrees are now sort of moot if you were in school over 5 years ago. Yeah it hurts, I am getting old as well). I am not so quick to think it isn’t of merit… but it will take some fixing to get old marketers communicating with new marketers. It is like the dorky book scientist that needs to explain his innovation to the public but cannot find a simple way to describe what a “Differential Microwave Radiometer”* does.
So… we have hotels looking at social media as a compartmentalized outlet for people to bitch about something with other bitchers (pardon the colloquialistic expression… just imagine you are at one of those managers meetings during a lunch hour with those “types”… you know?).
But it isn’t that. Well it is. Actually. Just look at my previous post. Sure I attack the consumer, but I must take a swing at the stodgy old hotelier once inawhile too.
Social media is a vital tool for a couple reasons. One is that you can retroactively “hear” consumers and respond, both directly to them and about the situation. How you respond is up to you…. like employees fishing comment cards out of the box and ripping up the ones with their name (saw it happen, never did it), or getting these comments to the department heads: GM for serious issues, Rooms for cleanliness issues, Maintenance for broken hooks, etc. It can actually help you run your business, sure!
But what is more important is where it is taking your brand, and what being aware of social media can do for your brand in the coming 100 years. Reidentifying, repurposing, and shifting your old brand (that was pushed through old media efforts) into this new world of anti-marketing and all advertising becoming spam.
The upshot is that you can reorganize your business into something with purpose, meaning, ethos, and intent. Instead of pushing a terrible product (no offense, anyways I mean the other guy reading this) on people with glam marketing tactics like direct mail pieces and flashy billboards (that was tongue in cheek), you reorganize your structure to understand and yield to consumer demand and interest.
Finally, that one human to one human connection exists between social reviewer and business. When you start seeing how the new market works, and how the new consumer handles businesses (in this case a hotel) you will be able to go from pushing your product, to listening, learning and then packaging your product into something not so much “sellable”, as something highly “DESIRABLE”.
Force fed consumers are a thing of the past, and now consumers create individuality with their demand for quality products to endorse. People are empty vessels to fill with your brand if they so identify or appreciate the intent behind it.
Realize this. It isn’t about selling a product anymore. It is about creating a product people want.
When your brand / hotel / business stops pushing itself on a million people that don’t care about you, and really listening to the 1000′s that do… and modeling yourself to the market…. is when you will start being successful in this post-advert world.
(* a microwave instrument that would map variations / anisotropies in the CMB)
Tags: brand awareness, brand identity, brand marketing, CRM, customer relations, hotel marketing, hotel news, online marketing, seo, smo, Social Media, socialmedia, web 2.0
Fri 23 Jan 2009
Posted by Michael Hraba under Hospitality Marketing
178 views | No Comments
Here is a quick and brilliant lesson on the future of search engines, and how hotels (and others) will be able to utilize their “back to the future” functionality. Keywords are not the be all end all.
SEO PEOPLE! MARKETERS! WEB DESIGN! and hotel people to boot….. some really interesting thoughts
http://www.hotelmarketing.com/index.php/content/article/the_future_of_search_5_ways_to_prepare/
http://www.hotelmarketing.com/index.php/content/article/the_future_of_search_5_ways_to_prepare/
Thu 15 Jan 2009
Posted by Michael Hraba under Hospitality Marketing
69 views | No Comments
This is a *ahem* fictional *ahem* response to a business owner responding to a reviewer on yelp.
————————————-
I adore you. I simply adore you. Thank you for taking the time to write. I will try you again, albeit I will respectfully have my own opinion regardless of the outcome. What is refreshing is you are yet another example of why I don’t know about yelp, in general.
1) I am taking down my second review, and I am altering my first…. check it out. It should be for the best.
2) please keep interacting with yelpers like this… as well as other online reviewers (you can check your brand on twitter (it may be too young to be there), as well as see if chowhound, mouthfuls, eater sf, or any other outlet like Zagat has found you and written you up. Tripadvisor and Zagat both have review areas and chat boards for restaurants (obviously).
3) I am a long time yelper, albeit it may not look like it. Over time I have become very, very skeptical of the business model and usefulness of reviews. I think, at some point, a critical mass of reviews (coupling 1 stars with 5 stars, and then the mid range ones) will average almost everything out to 3 stars.
The networking effect is powerful here, but the ad model is weak and the site isn’t making any revenue. What’s more, the management seems to be busy orchestrating a hipster social scene while ignoring the hypocrisy of searching for money from merchants, while doggedly ignoring their pleas to verify reviewers in lieu of their caddy, inane, rude, unprofessional, or just moronic remarks. the more I watch yelp…. the more I think it is totally idiotic. the problem is that people are latching onto it without understanding it, and it gets more credit than it deserves. As a business owner you understand that much of it is stupid, while the tool it presents business from a marketing and client relations perspective is incredible.
But you get uniformed people who don’t get F&B, free standing establishments, or this market. Or exactly what *you* and other incredible chefs are trying to do. And these people are writing reviews that effect your business. I have a problem with that because the uninformed public actually latches on to reviews and believes them.
There is enough difficulty in this economy in general, and in this market for food&bev…. you don’t need yet another yelper being rude and dismissive, judgmental or flip about all the hard work you put into building your brand and base.
what really bugs me about those that yelp:
instead of wanting to resolve the situation or actually help the restaurant, business, or what have you….. they wait to get home and bitch.
Instead of professionally dealing with a negative or unpleasant situation as it happens, and grabbing management…. yelpers simply wish to ramble inanely.
If this was a better tool to resolve problems, I would be convinced. For now, it seems like really loud and sadly impacting locker room talk (Thanks Mr. Anderson).
Thank you again for responding.