This was an open letter to someone in the Google Travel department/vertical that happens to be a friend.
I will 100% not be posting response, and I likely will not relate much if it is confidential. I will only relate what is said to be okay.
I am trying to move the needle for the independent hotel industry. We need help, and I am not sure there is anyone else (maybe tripadvisor) that controls the needle. At least not like Google.
—-
I am a deeply experienced operator with how google travel works, and we do find the metasearch opportunities a refreshing alternative to OTAs. Fighting the OTAs has been our priority, and getting people to come direct. In fact, 4 of our hotels do not participate in OTAs, but there’s drawbacks to that, too.
So:
1) One is about how Independent hotels struggle in your ecosystem. Independent hotels are the bread and butter of authentic, genuine, personalized travel experiences, something most tech companies chase as a trend, and we’re often leveraged for experiential marketing, but left in the cold because we don’t have a brand/flag behind us, we can’t compete with OTA marketing dollars, and the VRBO thing is nipping at our toes.
This article is important, for understanding what we’re up against w/ AirBnB, Brands/Flags, Tech travel vertical, OTA marketing, etc. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/business/independent-hotels-airbnb-boutique-chains.html
But brands/flags are specifically what people DON’T want (save corporate loyalty, etc), which is why they’re creating so many sub-brands to confuse consumers into thinking they are independent, boutique, hip, etc. And VRBO/AirBnB have zero consistency, or brand standards, and corporate people are aware of the issues from rental to rental.
All that being said, independents also are the shining jewels of american hospitality, and there are legitimately zero ways to “find” us in search. There’s no filters, no check boxes, etc. What’s worse- that consumers love independents, but the word they use is “boutique”, which was hijacked long ago.
I wanted to start this as a tech business, but I don’t have developers or any idea how to get this started, but my dream would be a boutique and independent hotel OTA, that charges the traditional 10% travel agency fee for bookings. I want a better consumer user experience, better travel experiences (which reinforce the booking process that google is the start of), and I want hotels to feel less threatened by technology who take a lot of cuts of our revenues. If I can’t get something like this done, I am sure Google could. At least, create an educational campaign with new filters or check boxes to identify and allow filtering of independent hotels from larger brands/flags.
2) redirection of organic direct searches in search: Is Google acting like a traditional travel agent? I have data on this (I can send, but want to keep this short), but we see google’s travel ecosystem doing something sort of unfair to our hotels in search.
Someone organically searched a hotel’s proper name, exactly (“Waldorf Astoria New York City”), and the Google Travel ecosystems takes what was a click into our website and direct booking, by filtering users down the path into booking through the google ecosystem. That seems seriously unfair to us.
But then, we see 10% charges with IATA numbers attached to google campuses/addresses. Is this an algorithmic machine learning type of travel agent, or is this literally a bunch of people with different #IATA numbers. I’ve seen a few different ones, and was wondering if those are literally human being travel agents at google? We do appreciate the traditional 10%, but if it was already coming directly to our website, feels sorta iffy, and we’ve zero power to correct that.
Can anything be done about how google filters direct bookings into its ecosystem, after redirecting organic direct searches away from our website?
3) The issue of disambiguations in travel search, which skew resulting searches to a smaller area, ie when the term “napa” is pejoratively used for “Napa Valley”, and people don’t know their limiting themselves because search returns Napa city properties, vs Napa Valley’s full region. When you search “Napa”, you get 30 hotels. Most users actually want all of Napa Valley, but don’t realize to search it. How would we have that disambiguation end up giving people searching Napa Valley the entire valley, when they search “Napa”. No one searches “Napa” and means the city alone, especially in travel search and trip planning.
4) I would also like to talk about a concept, if you deal with F&B, of a restaurant aggregator within google…. right now it’s easy to book if you know what restaurant you want. But even then, you have to juggle between opentable and seatme, depending where they’re at.
But general restaurant searches are really hard, because there are big blind spots, ie if you are in opentable, you miss all the tock and reserve.com and seatme restaurants. I know you’ve added interfacing with restaurants based off tile cards, but those don’t help in general restaurant searches. An aggregator of opentable, reserve, seatme/yelp, and tock (and the 5 or 6 others) would be DIVINE.
5) What perks/benefits are you going to use with Google One? I haven’t understood how you are going to take storage plans and leverage those users into google travel members who will build loyalty within the ecosystem, but the new hotel search is pretty slick.
I am not sure you know the Google One thing, so here, regarding rewards and a sort of loyalty:
https://one.google.com/benefits/8ea43ea61a39905473a92d9198d1f3d0
6) When you jump off that page to search hotels, I do note search doesn’t work all that well. Note both searches pop up under hotels:
I don’t know how I returned post offices, but I just tried to recreate it, and searching “highest rated hotels” in the US returns state parks:
It would be a professional dream if I could somehow help our independent hotel industry. We’re loved by all, but brand / OTA / vacation rental / tech forces are making us struggle, and it would be amazing to be part of something “bigger”, in fixing this, and enhancing consumer travel experiences, from booking to enjoying. =)
Recent Comments